What should be forgotten? Time to make sense of Article 17 GDPR from the point of view of data controllers, by Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel

The Court of Justice of the European Union’s recognition of a right to obtain the removal of one’s personal data displayed in search engine results (Case C-131/12, Google Spain, EU:C:2014:317) has opened policy discussions on the conditions under which individuals’ data are to be deleted by data controllers. Those discussions culminated in Article 17 of the new General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679  (GDPR) explicitly stating … Continuer de lire What should be forgotten? Time to make sense of Article 17 GDPR from the point of view of data controllers, by Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel

Implementing the Right To Be Forgotten: towards a co-regulatory solution ? by N. Zingales and A. Janczuck

Abstrat: In Google Spain, the CJEU established a so called “right to be forgotten” (RTBF) from the results of search engines for individuals claiming that the information available at a link prompted by a search for their name is “inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive”. This judgment is revolutionary not only for the far-reaching consequences of the principle it sets up, but also … Continuer de lire Implementing the Right To Be Forgotten: towards a co-regulatory solution ? by N. Zingales and A. Janczuck

The Right To Be Forgotten as a positive force for freedom of expression, by Paul Bernal

Le droit à l’oubli : une force positive pour la liberté d’expression, par Paul Bernal Résumé: Cet article présente l’approche contre-intuitive selon laquelle, plutôt que d’être une menace pour la liberté d’expression et l’accès à l’information, le droit à l’oubli – si appliqué de manière convenable et transparente – peut y contribuer de manière positive. De plus, l’article suggère que le droit à l’oubli peut … Continuer de lire The Right To Be Forgotten as a positive force for freedom of expression, by Paul Bernal

Article mis en avant

Le programme de la semaine de notre e-conférence sur le droit à l’oubli en Europe et au-delà

Nous entamons ce jour la deuxième semaine de notre e-conférence, dont voici le programme. (Re) voir les contributions publiées ICI N’hésitez pas à mettre des commentaires dans les posts pour poser vos questions aux auteurs ou réagir sur un point. Bonne lecture Continuer de lire Le programme de la semaine de notre e-conférence sur le droit à l’oubli en Europe et au-delà

Le droit à l’oubli numérique en Suède, par Patricia Jonason

Abstract: Google has received about 15,000 requests for delisting regarding Swedish websites. Yet, in more than half of the cases the American search engine operator refused to remove the disputed websites from their results. What kind of help may individuals to whom a request for delisting has been denied expect from public authorities expect from public authorities? In other words, how do the Swedish authorities … Continuer de lire Le droit à l’oubli numérique en Suède, par Patricia Jonason

Le droit à l’oubli dans l’ordre juridique italien, par Pietro Falletta

 Abstract: In Italy, the right to be forgotten is framed by the Code on the protection of personal data. It is based on the respect of the rights and fundamental freedoms and the protection of human dignity, more specifically on the respect of discretion and the right to the protection of personal data. In addition, it entails the conformity of the processing of personal data … Continuer de lire Le droit à l’oubli dans l’ordre juridique italien, par Pietro Falletta

Trois enseignements à tirer de la mise en oeuvre juridictionnelle de l’arrêt Google Spain, par Olivia Tambou

Three lessons from the judicial implementation of the Google Spain Case in France, by Olivia Tambou, Associate professor at the University Paris-Dauphine Asbract: In French law, we find a dozen referrals to the courts regarding the right to de-listing. The national judge is the usual judge of the right to de-listing. This affirmation has a particular meaning in France, a country with a dual judicial … Continuer de lire Trois enseignements à tirer de la mise en oeuvre juridictionnelle de l’arrêt Google Spain, par Olivia Tambou

The Application of the Right to Be Forgotten in Spain, by Miquel Peguera

Spain is an interesting country when it comes to the so-called ‘right to be forgotten’ (RTBF). After all, the famous CJEU judgment recognizing this right in relation to search engines stemmed from a request for a preliminary ruling made by a Spanish court (the Audiencia Nacional, AN) following a procedure initiated before the Spanish Data Protection Authority (DPA) by a Barcelona citizen, Mario Costeja González. … Continuer de lire The Application of the Right to Be Forgotten in Spain, by Miquel Peguera

Three years after the Google Spain v. Costeja Case: Quo Vadis? Introductory remarks by Olivia Tambou

Comme toute conférence, il faut commencer par des propos introductifs et annoncer le programme. Bonne lecture et n’hésitez pas à mettre des commentaires ou à nous contacter si vous souhaitez réagir plus longuement par un post. Abstract: These introductory remarks question the nature of the Right To Be Forgotten (RTBF) introduced in European Law and present an initial state of the implementation of the Google … Continuer de lire Three years after the Google Spain v. Costeja Case: Quo Vadis? Introductory remarks by Olivia Tambou

Article mis en avant

Launch of our e-conference on the right to be forgotten in Europe and beyond at 12:30 pm

On the third anniversary of Google Spain Blogdroiteuropéen wishes to take stock of the current situation and assess the impact of this famous judgment which is often said to have consecrated a right to be forgotten. Many of you have responded to our call for contributions for this first e-conference and we are very thankful. Your enthousiasm confirms the interest and expectations concerning this topic, which raises many … Continuer de lire Launch of our e-conference on the right to be forgotten in Europe and beyond at 12:30 pm